Is it possible to know something, and yet be unable to convincingly explain how you know it? I think so.
[Just to be clear, when I say “I know something” I mean that I believe I know it. But then what else could it mean?]
David Henderson recently said:
Like Scott, I doubt that the CIA was behind the JFK assassination, but all I have is doubt. I don’t have the certainty that Scott has and I don’t know what’s behind that certainty.